Add the imminent passing of the millennium and you have a situation that couldn't be more ripe for feeding public fascination and anxiety. Ancient Myth and Modern Science, directed by the Canadian filmmaker Robert Nichol. Or the incalculable sums we invest annually in tools of learning -- books and institutions and teachers, all passing on tenets about the past, the nature of the solar system, the evolution of the earth, the origins of man, the emergence of civilization, the birth of the first ritual, literary and artistic traditions -- all fundamentally rooted in uniformitarian error. At our symposium in November of 1994, I asked the astronomer Tom Van Flandern if he agreed with this statement: I found it quite gratifying when he agreed with both statements. Talbott:
With respect to the status of the hypothesis today, what tenets would you say are most solidly established? It was, according to them, a rotating comet spewing streams of gas into surrounding space. Certainly it's an indisputable fact that the models dominating mainstream science arose under the pervasive influence of the uneventful solar system -- perceived as a symphony of regular and predictable motions occurring virtually from the beginning. But in its pristine, gravity-only form, the distance between planets (not to mention the implied climatic extremes) won't satisfy all of the data to be explained. What about the planetary identifications that are so fundamental to your conclusions? Throughout the years, continuing research has forced him to change various aspects of his unfolding Saturnian scen-ario, although the basic premise behind it remains unchanged. Now the academic requirement for one to accept this theoretical framework may have been understandable in the 50s, before the coming of the space age and planetary exploration. For the benefit of our new readers, let's go back to the beginning for a moment. People want to know where the Saturn thesis is headed. Arquitectura Viva covers current topics, taking stock of recent trends in set sections cover story, works projects, art culture science, écriture et idéologie dans l’œuvre de roland barthes. Saturn as a central, stationary, luminary. Is planetary history really relevant? Mars as son and consort of the mother goddess. Heartbreak, revenge, good-looking chick, pathetic guys who trail after her – humdrum but this is not kind communism we re referring essay marx, engels, lenin, trotsky, stalin, hitler. Perhaps you could identify the basic components of the model first, before we get into the evolutionary stages. Examples would include Victor Clube and William Napier, Fred Hoyle, and the Australian astronomer Duncan Steele, all of whom have resorted to references in myth to substantiate the ancient experience of cosmic catastrophe. Talbott:
Venus as the heart or soul, a central star animating the Universal Monarch. It was because the events were extraordinary that they registered so deeply on human consciousness, and the themes survived for thousands of years. This has, of course, thrown open the door in a way that will unnerve many scholars. Even Carl Sagan and Nancy Dru-yan, notice the prevalence of an ancient symbol, the swastika, and propose a celestial origin for the symbol. There have been various modifications of your own model. Nevertheless, over many years, a few of the really wild guesses have turned out to be keys as the related pieces fell into place. AEON: So we are simply suggesting that the objects of the obsession were planets moving close to the earth, a claim well-founded on the emphatic statements of the first astronomers. That our sky, today, provides no basis for this ancient idea is precisely why the recurrence of the idea from one culture to another is significant. The first and foremost challenge, I think, is the inertia of collective belief. The model begins with an apparently stable or quasi-stable collinear system, with Saturn occluding the terrestrial view of Jupiter, Venus appearing in the center of Saturn, and Mars appearing inside of Venus.